![]() |
MAIL | TOP PAGE | TOP PAGE(ENGLISH) |
| Top Page(English) > Human Rights Education > HRE in Asian Schools > Vol.9 > This Page |
|
South Asia Workshop on Human Rights Education in Schools HURIGHTS OSAKA A workshop on integrating human rights education into the school curriculum was held in New Delhi on 13-15 December 2005 with the participation of curriculum developers and other educators[1] from the Ministries of Education and government education institutes in India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.[2]
HURIGHTS OSAKA organized the workshop in partnership with the Centre for Peace and Conflict Resolution of the Jamia Millia Islamia in New Delhi, India.Workshop objectives
The workshop, designed for curriculum developers of the Ministry of Education, had the following objectives:
Opening ceremonies
Workshop proceedings
The workshop proper started with the presentation on the international and regional contexts of the workshop. Mr. Jefferson R. Plantilla of HURIGHTS OSAKA presented some of the international developments that support human rights education including the United Nations (UN) Decade for Human Rights Education, the UNESCO conferences and the UN World Programme for Human Rights Education. He pointed out that there are also a number of regional activities such as the annual workshop on Regional Cooperation for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights in the Asia-Pacific organized by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, and the Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions (APF) organized by the national human rights institutions in the region. These two annual regional human rights activities declare support for human rights education.
He also stressed that South Asian countries under the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) have signed two major human rights instruments (regarding women and girls[4]) which call for efforts to increase public awareness on human rights. He therefore emphasized that the workshop supports all the international, regional and subregional initiatives on human rights or human rights education.nbsp; Ms. Zenaida Reyes of the Philippine Normal University, facilitated the session on the participants’ concerns or issues about human rights. Most participants raised the problem of making human rights a reality. They cite the obstacles toward the realization of human rights in the school, at home, in the community and in the country as a whole. Some participants expressed concern about the lack of understanding of duties in addition to the understanding of human rights. Others expressed the problem emanating from the education system which is getting more competitive and focused on language, mathematics and science and very little on social issues such as human rights. They see this situation as a major obstacle to integrating human rights education into the school curriculum. The following issues came out in the discussion
Mr. Abdulrahim P. Vijapur of Jamia Millia Islamia discussed the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). He discussed the concept of the rights of the child, and the history of drafting the CRC to address some of the objections raised against it, and the particular rights provided for in the instrument. He cited the 4 major principles in the CRC, namely,
He also explained some problems relating to the implementation of the CRC due to the number of reservations registered by many countries, the delay in submission of country reports to the Committee on the Rights of the Child, among others. The experiences of India and the Philippines on integrating human rights education into the school curriculum were presented by Mr. Arjun Dev, formerly of the Indian National Council for Educational Research and Training (NCERT) and Ms. Lolita Nava of the Philippine Normal University respectively. Both presentations pointed out specific subject areas that can be used to discuss human rights. They also mentioned briefly the results of a multi-country survey on educational policies and human rights awareness of students.[5] Ms. Nava pointed out the constitutional as well as legal support for human rights education in Philippine schools. A number of executive and administrative issuances have been made that support human rights education in schools. She also discussed the Basic Education Curriculum 2002 which reduced the learning areas from nine to five (English, Filipino, Mathematics, Science and MAKABAYAN). The MAKABAYAN learning area includes Social Studies, Music, Arts, Physical Education, Technical and Livelihood Education and Values Education. Most of the entry points on peace and human rights concepts are in Social Studies subject. She explained how human rights are incorporated in the different subjects in primary and secondary curriculums. She also presented a sample lesson plan on human rights. She mentioned that there are several government projects on women, children and indigenous peoples which also provide avenues for teaching human rights. Finally she presented some highlights of the Philippine results under the 4-country survey on human rights awareness of students. She mentioned the school as being the primary source of knowledge on human rights, and that generally the students say they know human rights. But this awareness of human rights does not seem to result into human rights practice. Thus there is a gap between the claim of human rights awareness and practice. She also noted that students who come from areas where human rights violations are common seem to have higher level of human rights awareness. Mr. Dev briefly discussed the development of the school curriculum in India from the 1970s to late 1990s. The first curriculum framework was adopted in 1975 which was not a national one and was meant for the first 10 years of education. In 1986 India had a landmark document in the form of a comprehensive policy of education which gave structure to Indian education, this was the National Education Policy (NEP). It envisaged much more clearly what should be the core ideological orientation of the school curriculum. He noted that in the 1990s some ideas began to constantly change and in 2002 a new curriculum framework and new textbooks came out. Inbetween 2002 and 2004 there was a controversy involving the curriculum, which actually started from 2000 onward. The controversy involved the issue of saffronization that actually meant colonization instead of secularization. Some of the political parties started reversing the process of saffronization in 2004. In that year, when government changed, older history textbooks which were thought to be against our national values were brought back and then a new curriculum was framed. He said that human rights are not taught as a separate subject in the curriculum. Various components of human rights are reflected in various subjects. The Indian school system has a very rigid curriculum and whatever is prescribed in textbooks is taught in schools. There is less creativity on the part of the teacher in this context. In most cases up to Grade X textbooks are also prescribed for each board/school system. Similar approach is even followed in case of environmental education. Up to Grade X, all subjects are compulsory and two to three languages are taught. Everybody does mathematics, science, physical education, and art education. At senior secondary level (Grades XI and XII), NCERT developed a core course that provides student with the freedom to choose subjects. It may be possible to consider human rights within the subjects and an integrated view of school education curriculum may be done up to Grade X. In subjects like history, geography, language, one of the objectives is to develop a sense of critical thinking among the students towards their own country. So in the case of human rights education, a critical view of society is being developed. All human rights issues become part of the curriculum. The only thing needed to do is to develop independent critical minds. If this is done, there is education in human rights. History is even full of instances of how Indians fought against various injustices – e.g. under British rule rights were violated, the Indian freedom movement was totally non-sectoral and free from racial hatred of the English people. The Indian struggle for freedom is important if it is taught to inculcate human rights to students. To understand the universality of human rights we need to understand the Indian freedom movement and struggle. History is capable of providing examples to conceptualize human rights. There is no school curriculum in India, for example, which does not include post second World War racism. At the primary level social studies subjects include biographies of great people both Indian and foreign like Martin Luther King, and Abraham Lincoln. A 1997 Commonwealth survey involving India, Zimbabwe, and some more countries revealed that the Indian curriculum is the only major curriculum which has included all aspects of human rights. The students’ performance level in India was much more than those in other countries. He likewise presented some results of the India survey, under the recent 4-country survey on human rights awareness of secondary students. He noted that in some cases, students who come from less developed areas and schools are much more aware of human rights. Ms. Pranati Panda, Reader of the NCERT, made the final presentation dealing with the concept of integration of human rights education into the school curriculum. She briefly presented the definition of human rights education as formulated by the United Nations. She stressed that human rights education
She mentioned the different integration approaches, the link between integration of human rights education into the school curriculum with its integration into teacher education curriculum, the need to relate to issues affecting students, and the use of participatory teaching/learning processes. A section of her presentation was later used as a guideline for the curriculum review exercise. On integration she presented the various approaches as follows:
Partici pants’ presentations
During the second half of the workshop, the participants reviewed their school curriculums and presented what could be done to improve the integration of human rights education into the school curriculum. They were provided with the following guidelines, taken from the presentation of Ms. Panda, for developing curriculum with human rights content:
The Nepali participants (Mr. Indra Bahadur Shrestha[6] and Mr. Soviet Ram Bista[7]) presented the problem posed by the current internal armed conflict in Nepal which has been causing not only damage to school facilities but death and physical injury to students, teachers and education officials. They proposed to make all schools in Nepal as “Zones of Peace” in addition to supporting students and teachers at the community level. In their paper “Effect of Conflict in School Education” they state that Nepal is now facing an armed conflict situation, which has never been experienced before.[8] Since the conflict started in the mid-1990s, hundreds of thousands people have been affected badly across the country. The conflict started in the midwestern part of Nepal, which is considerably a poor area compared to other parts of the country. Communist insurgents have specifically targeted landowners, teachers, political leaders and other government employees. Most of the displaced people have either flocked to the main cities or fled to India. People who have been displaced are gathered in district headquarters, and big cities like Kathmandu, Pokhara, Nepalgunj, Surkhet, etc. Those who are displaced from their own villages, first stayed at district headquarters and then moved to the urban areas. The conflict situation has affected the education service delivery system. They mentioned that the fifth of the twelve strategies adopted by the Dakar World Education Forum in 2000 explicitly focuses on the rights of children in emergencies. This strategy stresses the importance of meeting. “…the needs of education systems affected by conflict, natural calamities and instability and conduct[ing] educational programs in ways that promote mutual understanding, peace and tolerance, and that help to prevent violence and conflict”. They cited the call of Dakar Framework for Action (UNESCO, 2009:9) for national Education for All (EFA) plans to include provision for education in emergency situations. Governments, particularly education ministries, have an important role to play in an area that has often been dominated by the actions of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and United Nations agencies. Most of the teachers in conflict-affected areas have been threatened by the insurgents. Thousands of teachers and students are being abducted. In this way the ongoing conflict in the country has created a number of problems in the urban/plain areas. Normally the classrooms in the urban areas are already crowded. There is already severe shortage of teachers in those areas. The influx of people from the mountain and hilly areas coupled with displacement due to the conflict has further worsened the already ailing teaching/learning situation across the country. This is particularly true in districts with overcrowded classrooms such as Bardiya, Banke, Kailali, Kanchanpur, Rupandehi, Morang, Jhapa, etc. Therefore, there is an urgent need to address the problems by building additional classrooms and providing the needed teachers. The insurgents attack school buildings every now and then. Unilateral truce provides comparatively more peaceful situation in the country. The insurgency resulted into the following:
The government has taken some steps to address the problem by collecting information from the affected districts and regions in order to assess the impact, allocating budget to assist the affected people and to develop the schools as “zones of peace”,[8] reviewing the national school curriculum to make Sanskrit an optional subject in lower secondary level, reassigning teachers to safer areas, providing affected students scholarship to continue their study, and keeping the schools open as much as possible despite the difficult situation. The soon-to-befinalized National Curriculum Framework for primary level (grades 1-12) has a provision supporting initiatives to address local needs. The government has formed a “Curriculum Reform Recommendation Committee” and the Committee has submitted its report to MOES. Proposed Human Rights Curriculum A. Primary Level (Grades 1 - 5)
They explained that the current school curriculum includes the teaching of human rights in the form of rights provided for in the Nepali Constitution. The constitution guarantees the following human rights of every citizen:
Proposed human rights curriculum for primary and secondary levels are provided here on pages 94 and 95. Proposed Human Rights Curriculum B. Secondary Level (Grades 6 - 10) The same pattern as in primary level is followed here
Sri Lanka The Sri Lankan participants mentioned, as a background, that a few years ago some teachers were protesting the teaching of human rights in schools due to alleged rise of indiscipline among the students, and likely also due to fear that they were liable to be sued for their actions to discipline students. The government however continued to support human rights education in Sri Lankan schools. The participants proposed the integration of human rights education into the primary curriculum through environment-related activities as well as subjects such as geography, civic education, science, esthetic education, and physical education. Environment-related activities can be used to learn human rights principles such as nondiscrimination and equality, freedom of expression, right to culture, right to work, right to property, and equality before the law. In addition to teaching human rights within the subjects, they can also be taught through ways of teaching, and special projects (such as inclusive education, and education on other languages - Tamil for Singhalese students or Singhala for Tamil students). For the secondary level, the inclusion of human rights into the civics and governance subjects will be strengthened. Under the proposed civics and governance subjects, there is a specific topic on human rights and duties, as well as inclusion of human rights in other topics regarding government, law, the economic system and international relations. The Sri Lankan participants separately presented the proposed integration of human rights education into primary and secondary curriculums. Mr. Eriyagama Lekamalage Suranimala[9] stressed that in integrating human rights concepts into the school curriculum, the following considerations were given weight: - Stage of the child’s cognitive development and - Stage of the child’s moral development. He then explained how to introduce human rights into the primary education curriculum, as in the following table.
He also explained the three-dimension model of introducing human right concepts used in this sample curriculum, consisting of
Integration of human rights concepts into environment-related activities Grades One and Two
Integration of human rights concepts into environment-related activities Grades Three to Five
2. Second Dimension Mr. Suranimala explained the second dimension - Way of teaching – as
The third dimension involves special projects to improve the situation by focusing on the following:
He explained that the government of Sri Lanka is continuously accelerating the promotion of human rights education in both formal and informal education systems. The Ministry of Education and the National Institute of Education are jointly developing several programs relating to curriculum development, pre- and in-service training, and awareness-raising in support of human rights education. Human rights education has been included in the school curriculum more than two decades ago through the National Curriculum (formal education). It is now in the form of subjects on “Civic Education” and “Civics & Governance” for Grade 6 -11 for secondary schools with major focus on CRC, UDHR and other human rights documents, and relevant institutions involved in human rights work. In addition, the government established a Ministry named Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights, which promotes human rights activities through comprehensive programs that enhance community development. The following national and international (intergovernmental and non-governmental) institutions promote human rights in Sri Lanka:
Grades 10 - 11 Aim This course is designed to enable students to understand principles of government and economic activity, along with their practice, with particular reference to Sri Lanka. Through this they should appreciate the importance of democratic and responsible structures and lifestyles that contribute to the productive development of people within a social environment Objectives
The syllabus consists of discrete areas in which students will be introduced to basic human rights principles. The historical development of human rights may be introduced whenever relevant to the issues, while students should be encouraged to analyze the application or nonapplication of such principles in the Sri Lankan context. Comparison with other countries should be facilitated through project work. The ability to distinguish between functions and structures should be developed, along with understanding of goals and the means whereby these can be pursued. The importance of democratic governance on the basis of accountability to the citizenry should be appreciated. Topics to be covered
The following learning methods are proposed in teaching the subjects Civic Education and Civics and Governance. Further information could be obtained from the teachers’ guides and in-service training sessions. Teachers are free to use these learning methods as appropriate in the learning-teaching process in the classroom:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HURIGHTS OSAKA | Copyright 2006-2007 HURIGHTS OSAKA. |